Skip to content
OpenCorvus
EN中
← Blog

OpenCorvus research and the paper

The proof-of-concept working paper and the task design for a longer system study.

The available PDF is a 16-page proof-of-concept working paper. The separate long-running task below requests a 30-page study; that requirement does not mean the available PDF has met it.

The research process calls for independent checks of source code, material, experiments and citations. The task requirements and workflow follow below; completion must be judged from the actual paper and evidence package.

Research paper

OpenCorvus: Evolving Expert Organizations for Professional Work

A proof-of-concept working paper on reusable expert organizations, domain specialization, and experience-driven updates. Includes preliminary AutomationBench results; the research and experiments are still in progress.

PoC Version Under Construction

English PDF · 16 pages · 11 September 2026

Read the PoC paper (PDF)

Opens in a new tab

Another long Mission

OpenCorvus writes the paper about OpenCorvus

A thirty-page, evidence-dense systems paper built from primary sources, executable evaluation, publication-grade figures, and an independent manuscript audit — not autobiography by assertion.

9squads55named roles

Original Mission requirements

  1. Reconstruct OpenCorvus from inspected source code, current architecture specifications, documentation, releases, and version history; do not write from memory or product claims.
  2. Research inspected related work, define falsifiable questions and bounded contributions, then design reproducible evaluation with baselines, metrics, uncertainty, failures, and ablations.
  3. Use Research Studio's analysis-report-quality Skill to create one validated evidence model before drafting a systems paper with at least 30 substantive main-text pages, excluding references and appendices.
  4. Do not pad the paper with repeated background, generic Agent prose, oversized figures, loose spacing, appendix migration, or unsupported claims.
  5. Redraw every necessary figure from accepted data with publication-grade hierarchy, labels, units, sample sizes, uncertainty, provenance, captions, and accessible encodings; raw notebook or chart-library output is forbidden.
  6. Independently review literature, novelty, logic, methods, statistics, facts, citations, hallucination risk, and presentation; resolve every critical and major finding and deliver the manuscript, source, bibliography, evidence ledger, figure sources, and reproduction guide together.

Required final deliveries

  • 30+ substantive pages
  • Source & architecture evidence
  • Reproducible evaluation
  • Publication-grade figures
  • Verified bibliography
  • Complete source & evidence bundle

Complete execution workflow

Research foundation

Freeze the questions, inspect primary sources, and reconstruct the system before making claims.

3 stages24 named roles

  1. Freeze the research charterScientific Research DesignFalsifiable questions, bounded contributions, competing explanations, evidence needs, ethics, and a no-padding acceptance contract.
  2. Build the source recordDeep ResearchInspected code, specifications, releases, history, papers, and official sources with claim-level locators and search limits.
  3. Reconstruct the systemAdvancedExecutable architecture evidence for control flow, persistence, Mission/Task semantics, squads, evolution, permissions, recovery, and observability.
Evaluation & reproduction

Run the declared baselines and ablations, then reproduce the central results independently.

2 stages11 named roles

  1. Run empirical evaluationData Analysis & Business InsightsReproducible baselines, cases, metrics, uncertainty, ablations, failure analysis, canonical tables, and checked quantitative claims.
  2. Reproduce independentlyReview & DebugClean-room reproduction of the claimed workflows and results, with root-cause fixes and unresolved limits recorded.
Evidence to manuscript

Position related work, refine every figure, and write thirty information-dense pages from one evidence model.

3 stages12 named roles

  1. Position the contributionPatent Landscape and Prior ArtA query-reproducible landscape that separates inspected prior work, overlap, defensible novelty, and unknowns.
  2. Refine every figureOffice DeliveryPublication-grade architecture, experiment, ablation, and comparison figures regenerated from accepted data — never raw plotting output.
  3. Write the thirty-page paperResearch StudioOne validated evidence model and a concise, information-dense 30+ page main paper whose claims, prose, tables, figures, limits, and references agree.
Independent manuscript audit

Challenge novelty, logic, methods, facts, citations, and presentation before accepting the final bundle.

1 stages8 named roles

  1. Audit and finish the manuscriptAcademic Paper ReviewResolved literature, novelty, logic, method, statistics, fact, citation, hallucination, and presentation findings, followed by a final figure-to-prose reconciliation.