Skip to content
OpenCorvus
← Blog

Reading the AutomationBench results

The reported results, sample scope and limits on cross-model comparisons.

This article retains the frozen evaluation previously shown on the homepage. It describes one evaluation, not a promise about future task success, cost or speed.

The current 100-case sample and the official held-out references use different sets. Reference values are not a cross-model ranking. Read the sample scope, strict-pass criterion and original evaluation evidence alongside the result.

Measured result

Mission raises the same Luna to 34.00%

100 AutomationBench cases scored by strict pass criteria: the unassisted model first, then the result after full OpenCorvus execution.

AutomationBench · Strict pass rate

OpenCorvus Mission Base

openai/gpt-5.6-luna
Original GPT-5.6 Luna8.07%Without OpenCorvus Mission orchestration
OpenCorvus Mission Base34.00%Same Luna model · 100 cases
Evaluated cases
100
Current frozen sample
Absolute lift
+25.93 pp
percentage points
Versus original Luna
4.21×
strict-pass multiple

Different-sample context

Official held-out results

Not a cross-sample rank
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash High30.44%
  • Claude Opus 5 Max26.94%
  • GPT-5.6 Terra Max21.00%
  • GPT-5.6 Sol Max19.63%

Reference values come from the supplied official held-out comparison. They do not use the same sample as this 100-case frozen run, so they provide scale context only, not a model ranking.